View Single Post
Old 05-11-2008, 12:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
bradlee180

Green Belt
 
bradlee180's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,043
Status: bradlee180 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by CEROVFC View Post
I dunno how to put it quite right. He's a fighter that aggressively throws bomb, yet at the exact same time shows masterful ability to roll with punches and avoid counters.

I can't think of another fighter who is so offensively minded, yet brilliant on defense simultaneously.

A true marvel, a true all time great. I guess you don't earn the moniker living legend for being less than absolutely stellar.
The prime "Manassa Mauler" Jack Dempsey circa 1918 to 1921, fits your description to a tee.

[IMG][/IMG]

Very clear film of Dempsey-Willard (can download preview clip.)
Getty Images - Unsupported browser detected

Jack Dempsey: To Victory.
YouTube - Jack Dempsey: To Victory

RE: The opening 90 seconds of Dempsey/Willard with Dempsey circling his prey before the carnage begins, and the sparring session with 6′6½″ Big Bill Tate as Dempsey prepared for Willard:
By God, that man could MOVE.

Ray Arcel trained Roberto Duran for a while (and Barney Ross, Tony Zale, Ezzard Charles, and Larry Holmes), and Arcel considered Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, and Muhammad Ali to be the 3 Greatest Heavyweights of All-Time.

Gene Tunney,1952- "Jack was no wild slugger.He was an extremely clever fusion of fighter and boxer..Gibbons was one of the all-time great boxers.Yet Gibbons could not outscore Dempsey..Unable to reach this clever opponent with a knockout punch,he(Dempsey) was still a fine enough combination of fighter and boxer to outscore him all the way."

Unfortunately, Dempsey's most destructive year, 1918 as a contender, went unfilmed.

Folks often wrongfully chalk Dempsey up as a 1-dimensional slugger nowadays based on a handful of films, most of them when he was past his prime.

Dempsey was more like a Heavyweight Roberto Duran.
bradlee180 is offline  | 
 
   
Reply With Quote