Quote:
Originally Posted by NinjaKilla187
Its a great analogy fucktard. Here's two more. Would you have an investment firm that had never actually made any money but had created some exotic new get rich quick scheme handle your finances? Or would you look for a firm that had a high historic rate of return?
Would you have your surgery done by a surgeon who had read medical books but never worked on a patient or by a guy with thousands of successful surgeries?
The bars and coffee shops are full of people dispensing advice about shit they have never actually tried. Good luck taking their advice.
|
The fighters who are assesing Lee are succesful. But realized Lee was better. The fighters who say Bruce was best are succesful surgeons. But they realized Bruce was better. Bruce wasnt a surgeon who had only read medical books. He actually put his skills up against fighters and they said he was unbeatable. So stop the weak analogies that ive got answers for constantly. !!!!
The guys who are assesing Bruce are succesful fighters. Great competitors. But they say Lee was best. Do you understand. Stop making out Bruce hadnt proved what he could do.
He didnt prove himself the traditional way. And why should he? If he did he would just be like everyone else. Bruce was a leader and did things his way. Total confidence in himself which everyone shared the same confidence in Bruce. Bruce Lee proved he was a great fighter to everyone he ever encountered. In their assesment he was the greatest fighter they had seen. They are in a position to come to those conclusions, because they were in the firing line of Bruce Lee. You werent Ninja. Bruce Lee hasnt proved he could beat all the MMA combatants fighting today. But it dont stop the fact Bruce Lee was a great, great fighter.
Those guys who had confidence in Lee are harder than you Ninja, so you would show the same confidence in him.