03-17-2008, 01:34 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Black Belt
Status:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugenicist
Better question:
Semitic is technically, purely a linguistic classification.
"This family includes the ancient and modern forms of Amharic, Arabic, Aramaic, Akkadian, Ge'ez, Hebrew, Phoenician, Maltese, Tigre and Tigrinya among others."
Most Semites are Islamic, why the hell do we still use the term "anti-semitism" for anti-Jewish views? Shouldn't Israelis be considered the most anti-Semitic group, since they routinely bomb semitic children? Add this to the fact that nearly 90% of Jews in first world countries are essentially genetically European Ashkenazis and married into their religion, and a majority in the US are not even religious, and it gets pretty confusing. Basically it's an ancient ethnic group and religion hijacked to house some people who realized they could get away with more in the business and legal world by becoming "ethnic".
As long as people don't admit the ADL and SPLC are essentially rivals to the KKK and La Raza and Nation of Islam, any criticism of anyone Israeli or Jewish will continue being borderline illegal.
However it is of value- You can make southern christian republicans vote for ANYTHING if theyre convinced it will save israel and therefore get them a ticket to heaven.
|
i'm pretty sure ig tore the above assertion to shreads in previous threads.
in this context semetic applies to jews, just like american means a person from the US not from chile.
__________________
After all, Russia has been critical to Europe’s history, and not necessarily a force for ill. What would Europe be like if Russia had not crushed Napoleon and Hitler?
|
| |
|