Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamit Aktas
3.71% is still too much. It should read 0%. Either a fighter shouldn't be able to lose by cut by an elbow (remove elbows to the face completely), or if a cut occurs, he should be allowed to continue fighting
|
That sounds really stupid to me. Since there are fighters losing to cuts from striking and knees, why should elbows be a special case? That just sounds stupid to me. Then you say that if a cut occurs the fighter should be allowed to continue. That is so stupid it makes me question if you were quillty of PWD (posting while using drugs). The fighters are already are allowed to fight with a cut as long as it doesn't cause a problem with vision or the blood loss becomes really serious. Either way it would be too dangerous to allow the fight to continue and could result in serious injury to the fighter. That is why it is stopped when either of those two happen. Saying that they should be allowed to continue when the fighter can't see or when he has lost enough blood to be life threatening is just plain stupid.