Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gregster
What he knows is how to estimate the size of intact Soviet equipment. How this translates into skill at forensic analysis of plane crashes by looking at a hole and a decidedly *not* intact plane is beyond me.
Of course, no matter what you think about the hole in the side of the Pentagon, there remains the matter of the chunks of airplane fuselage, the airplane langing gear, airplane wheels, airplane engine parts, and the charred remains of 184 airplane passengers. I'd sure like to hear Gen. Stubbelbine explain how parts of the airplane that didn't hit the Pentagon wound up all over the place around the crash site, and when he's done, I'd be happy to entertain any theories of his regarding how the bodies found in the wreckage which were in all but 5 cases positively ID'ed as being passengers on the plane manged to find their way into the crash site in badly-charred condition.
|
I will stir the pot....Watch this video....And before you boobs jump all over the obvious "Oh, this is a CT video that isn't believable, blah blah blah (there, I saved you some time icant)", pay attention to the freelance photographer that filmed the pentagon...Pay close attention to the lawn and the debris, the hole in the building and what he says regarding these things...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...08054676470714