Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Free like a dog
I can't figure out why some people believe that it's the governments duty to publish absolutely 100% of all information with regards to 9/11.
|
Now with some(I repeat SOME) CT's you cannot reason, they will believe what they believe no matter what.
For myself and many others we are CT's that want to be proven wrong. We want to believe that the government isnt feeding us a pile of bullshit but there are a lot of holes in their story that, if filled, will bring comfort to.
We are aware of certain things that are hidden from the general public (the other, supposedly clear, videos of planes hitting the pentagon) and it is hard for us to understand why these things are held back. It is hard for us to understand why things that can eliminate our skepticisism are being held privately. They have had a chance to see those tapes and videos 1,000,000 times over and are still held as a matter of national security. Why?
Overall I think the interview raised some ok questions but seemed like a real inturreptive dickwad (ala Oriley)