Yes, and Maia is a far worse pressure fighter than Strickland. Anderson didn't get lulled into stinkers, he willingly chose them because he was uncomfortable fighting on the front foot and initiating, particularly as he aged out. That's not a knock, some fighters are just more comfortable countering or leading. Silva also never fought someone like Strickland in his prime.He still easily beat Maia. It wasn't even close. If Strickland gets aggressive, he gets countered by young/fast Anderson. It'd look the same as the Perreira fight.
Could Anderson be lulled into a stinker and get outpointed? In theory, sure. But nobody did that to him in his prime and he fought better guys than Strickland.
He was also facing relatively bad competition on that point. Granted, before Strickland's hot streak I would say Strickland wasn't far off from those fighters, but the fact is he got a legit win over Izzy. Which is my way of saying, I don't actually know if Silva would have been aggressive against Strickland. I suspect he might have been annoyed by the length of Strickland's ranged weapons and sort of tight defense and just waited for a huge counter.I would say it depends a bit on which era of Silva were talking about, as his UFC run went on and "The Matrix" hype built he became more and more of a counter fighter but earlier Silva as say vs Franklin was much more aggressive.
I agree, which is why I said Silva would win most of the time. But you can't look at the Bisping or Maia fights and think, hey, Silva always shows up and fights perfectly and is a lock against a tough volume fighter who pressures very well and keeps a good guard.Stickland would probably land a good deal on him but I suspect the earlier Silva would probably out chin and overwhelm him.
Silva could most definitely finish Strickland, but he has a hell of a chin as demosntrated by Poatan not even putting him out cold on the cleanest of clean shots.It'd look the same as the Perreira fight.
Sean is about as a good of a defensive fighter, if not slightly better than Silva. Very similar defenses that rely on reads, reflexes and being clever, rather than layers and systems of defense.Sean doesn't even roll much or move his head; he would get pinned right on the chin from a strait and go down.
Poatan and Izzy are far more effective kickers than Silva was. Flash is cool, but both of those two are far more effective at using kicks and defending them.Lol no one has Silva's kicks today.
Sean wouldn't know what defend.
I don't disagree. But he was the same style fighter. In his prime, he backed up to the fence and had sketchy cage craft that relied on his reflexes for defense, as opposed to something systemic or coherent that would age well. It's why Aldo is streets ahead as a defensive fighter and aged so much better.
To put it in concrete terms, if Bisping fought Silva prime for prime, Bisping gets knocked out after a couple rounds where he wins by simply landing more jabs and glancing shots while Silva goofs off on the fence. Put it this way, prime Silva had a horrid fight with Maia. What's stopping him from doing the same against Strickland?
I do, I'm weighing in that Aldo fought much tougher competition and in divisions with much tougher aging curves. Not to mention Silva began his career at 22 and Aldo began his at 18.You know Aldo is 37 right now, correct? Aldo was 29 when he lost to McGregor, and is 6-7 since then.
Anderson was 31 when he won the title against Rich Franklin.
Better than Silva? insane brotherSean is about as a good of a defensive fighter, if not slightly better than Silva. Very similar defenses that rely on reads, reflexes and being clever, rather than layers and systems of defense.
Poatan and Izzy are far more effective kickers than Silva was. Flash is cool, but both of those two are far more effective at using kicks and defending them.
Silva never faced someone as good as most of Aldo's late career losses.
I do, I'm weighing in that Aldo fought much tougher competition and in divisions with much tougher aging curves. Not to mention Silva began his career at 22 and Aldo began his at 18.
You can compare Aldo's second fight against Holloway with Silva's against Bisping to get an idea of what I mean about Aldo having a more complete defensive style that ages better.
Silva never faced someone as good as most of Aldo's late career losses.
I'd say comparable in practice, similar in style. Strickland is a better kick defender and has a tighter guard, Silva has better reflexes and reads. Keep in mind Strickland's stats, if you care bout that thing, are brought down by fighting at WW against faster fighters. Not to mention that while I don't rate Strickland's MW resume very highly, Silva's wasn't the greatest either.Better than Silva? insane brother
Silva ended his UFC career with a 60% striking defense percentage, fighting over a decade past his prime. In his actual prime he was a 70-75% defensive fighter.
Sean at his absolute peak rn is at a 62%, without the fighting till he's 45 part lmao.
Sean is a badass with very good defense, but nobody is Anderson silva.
Maybe. But Aldo was about as great defensively against Holloway as we've seen. And Holloway is almost without a doubt the greatest pressure fighter mma has had to date. Not to mention he dropped down and stood toe to toe with Petr Yan for almost 25 mins. Someone like Holloway would be a nightmare for Silva. Not his fault MW was thing, but it is what it is.I’m not saying Silva’s style aged well. His style was based heavily on speed and reflexes, which are the first things to go with age, but you’re being pretty generous to Aldo here.
Just because Aldo utilizes good defensive fundamentals, doesn't mean he was a better defensive fighter. The only thing that matters are the actual results in the cage.I'd say comparable in practice, similar in style. Strickland is a better kick defender and has a tighter guard, Silva has better reflexes and reads. Keep in mind Strickland's stats, if you care bout that thing, are brought down by fighting at WW against faster fighters. Not to mention that while I don't rate Strickland's MW resume very highly, Silva's wasn't the greatest either.
Who knows how Strickland's style will age. I suspect not great, but can't say until we see it.
And like I've mentioned previously, Aldo is a world's better defensive fighter than Silva...like not even close.
Yeah...and he's a better defensive grappler and striker than pretty much anyone we've ever see, facing the competition he's faced.Just because Aldo utilizes good defensive fundamentals, doesn't mean he was a better defensive fighter. The only thing that matters are the actual results in the cage.
And Silva got heel hooked by a relative nobody. Hence we judge fighter's by the totality of their careers, not cherry pick their highs or lows.Jose got slept in 13 damn seconds, where was the defense?? Silva had a different style, that doesn't make him worse.
Not sure what would lead you to think Silva had better cardio. Aldo has a significantly higher striking rate, and some of those fights were back and forth wars, not one way traffic.Silva had far better cardio which is why he got hit less in his prime, Aldo has always tended to fade and his defense failed him multiple times in his prime years.
It's pretty much because he fought the significantly better competition, including two of the greatest pressure fighters of all time in Volk and Holloway. Not to mention Aldo's defensive stats are negatively affected by his checking of kicks (see the Munhoz fight).Defense is more than that, which is why Aldo doesn't have a better striking defensive percentage.
We can agree to disagree. I'd say he's a more effective defensive fighter, and a much better example of what good defense is given that very few athletes have the natural reflexes Silva had. You can take away the reflexes from Silva's game, and it falls apart. From someone like Aldo, it still works, just not as well.Anyway, I don't want to disparage Aldo, but saying he is a worlds better defensive fighter than Silva is crazy.
I would say Franklin is on a similar level to Strickland and Hendo is probably above him.He was also facing relatively bad competition on that point. Granted, before Strickland's hot streak I would say Strickland wasn't far off from those fighters, but the fact is he got a legit win over Izzy. Which is my way of saying, I don't actually know if Silva would have been aggressive against Strickland. I suspect he might have been annoyed by the length of Strickland's ranged weapons and sort of tight defense and just waited for a huge counter.
I agree, but I think Strickland is a much tougher style match up for Silva. Relatively speaking.I would say Franklin is on a similar level to Strickland and Hendo is probably above him.
Yup, I'd say a mid-fight finish after dropping rounds just on activity. Like I said, not a fight I'd ever want to see if I'm looking for entertainment.The difference of course is Silva did get hit more in that era and generally I think the idea of his ghost like defence was a bit of a myth but I suspect he would probably out chin/power Strickland.
I suspect Strickland would try and stop it turning into a war more than Rich and Dan did and he is arguebly a better counter puncher than they were but still I suspect Silva would probably endI agree, but I think Strickland is a much tougher style match up for Silva. Relatively speaking.
Yup, I'd say a mid-fight finish after dropping rounds just on activity. Like I said, not a fight I'd ever want to see if I'm looking for entertainment.